Nominated supplier
In the construction industry, ‘supplier’ is a very general term which refers to organisations contracted as part of the delivery of a built asset.
Typically, a contractor is able to purchase from their own choice of supplier, as long as they comply with the requirements set out in the specification. However, under certain circumstances, the client may wish to impose (or nominate) a particular supplier on the main contractor after the main contractor has been appointed.
The client may wish to use a particular supplier because:
- A particular product brand is required.
- The particular goods provided by the supplier are not widely available.
- There is an existing relationship with the supplier.
- Long delivery items are required where ordering is necessary before the appointment of a main contractor.
- Specialist design input is required in the early stages of design development.
- Complex or specialist industrial plant or equipment may be required, upon which the design will be based.
The mechanism for nominating is an instruction in relation to a prime cost sum to which the main contractor is entitled to add mark up and attendance costs. This allows the client to have direct separate negotiations with suppliers and feed their appointment into the contract after works by the main contractor have commenced.
A potential drawback of nominating a supplier is that the contractor is then not able to ‘shop around’ to obtain the best price or supplier. It is important therefore that suppliers are nominated with due consideration to their ability to supply in line with the project specification, programme and budget.
In addition, as the contractor has no choice in the selection of the nominated sub-contractor, they cannot be held responsible for their failure to perform. However, as the supply contract is with the main contractor, not with the client, the client should ensure that they have a direct warranty with the nominated supplier to guarantee performance and indemnify the client if any default allows a claim for loss and expense or extension of time by the main contractor.
The complexity of this situation means that some forms of contract no longer include provision for the nomination, preferring to 'name' suppliers instead.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.